Global Economic Governance Must Be Democratised, BRICS
“The BRIC
members have not injected nearly $100 billion into the IMF just to leave
everything as it was before.”
Statement
from the Summit of Brazil, Russia, India and China at their Summit in Brasilia
on April 14, 2010
From Huffington Post, 14/4/2010
BRASILIA - The term
"BRIC" was coined only ten years ago as an acronym meant to capture
the new reality that Brazil, Russia, India and China together had come to
account for 15 per cent of the world's GDP.
We are countries where everything
happens on a large scale. We represent nearly one half of the world population,
20 per cent of its land surface and are rich in natural resources.
Today, the BRICs have become
essential players in major international decision-making. As such we are
acutely aware of our potential as agents of change in making global governance
both more transparent and democratic.
This is the message Brazil
offered at the second BRIC Summit, held here in Brasilia, where the leaders of
Brazil, Russia, India and China gathered on April 15. We are committed to
building a joint diplomatic and creative approach with our BRIC partners in
order to tackle such global challenges as food security and energy production
in the context of climate change.
The real baptism by fire of the
group occurred during the financial crisis of the past two years. Far from
diminishing our weight, our collective strategies enabled us to hold our own.
In fact, the sound response of the four countries to the crisis of the
developed world opened up new alternatives to the shabby dogma inherited from
the past.
The collapse of financial markets
revealed the failure of paradigms previously considered to be unquestionable.
Truths about market deregulation collapsed. The ideal of a minimal state also
collapsed. The easing of labor rights is no longer a mantra to fight
unemployment.
When all these orthodoxies
collapsed, the visible hand of the state protected the economic system from the
failure created by the invisible hand of the market.
While some of the major countries
let speculative excesses flourish, BRIC countries promoted growth focused on
work and prudence. In Brazil, we never lost sight of the need to tackle social
inequality, lifting 20 million Brazilians out of poverty since 2003 and making
them full citizens.
At the G-20, we proposed
anti-cyclical policies, market regulation, curbing tax havens and renewal of
the Bretton Woods institutions. On this last score, we are determined not to
let the incipient signs of recovery in the global economy serve as an excuse
for abandoning a democratic remodel of these organizations. The BRIC members
have not injected nearly $100 billion into the IMF just to leave everything as
it was before.
As a group, we will continue to
advocate the democratization of the multilateral process of decision making.
Developing countries have the right to be heard. Bridging the gap that
separates them from the rich countries is not only a matter of justice. The
world's economic, social and political stability depends on this. It is our
best contribution to peace.
From our perspective as emerging
economies, the resources that are needed to overcome hunger and poverty may be
considerable, but are quite modest when compared to the cost of rescuing failed
banks and financial institutions that are victims of their own speculative
greed.
At the same time, there is no use
offering food and charity if the distortion in world agricultural trade still
persists. Unfair subsidies in rich countries discourage local production,
foster dependency and divert resources which would be better used in
development programs. For this reason, the conclusion of the Doha Round is
critical.
The negotiating impasse on global
issues is nowhere as serious as on climate change. In line with this, the BRIC
countries are committed to helping close the deal that was elusive in
Copenhagen. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions while maintaining robust growth
in developing countries requires that everyone do their part -- as the BRIC
countries have been demonstrating with ambitious initiatives to mitigate their
emissions.
For that reason, the large
traditional polluters have a special charge. The balance established by the
Kyoto Protocol is essential for us to move forward together.
The international scene is
cluttered with old problems, even as new ones emerge. Neither the BRIC members
nor any other countries are able to face them alone. In the past, unilateralism
has led to impasses, if not human catastrophes, such as Iraq.
In today's
world we must therefore rely increasingly on each other. For that to happen we
must forge a more representative and transparent system of global governance
that can both inspire unity of purpose and revitalize the collective will to
seek consensual solutions. In this journey toward a new world, the BRIC
countries are committed to working together to fulfill our responsibilities.
Published courtesy of the Global Viewpoint Network